BIS2010 Case Study 1 - ARCO Successful Submission

Dear Students,
These are the names of the students who have submitted the Case Study 1 - ARCO answers.
Keep up the Good Work .


Regards
Zainudin

Case Study 1 - ARCO 1 ( deadline 22 Dec 2009 - 5 pm Hardcopy)



Name of Student

• Ibrahim Marwan El Mekaty & Abdulaziz Yahya Al Radaei( Good piece of work - but I need the Hardcopy )
• Alec (Liu Hang), Chen Di, and Yang Nan ( brief but full-fill requirements but could have done better. Still need your Hardcopy )
• Haji Haji Mdungi, Abdallah Said Soud, Juma Ahmada Mzee ( Very good work and detail elaboration)
• Nur Syairah Baharam, Rika Mayang Sari & Nurshabana Nagaruddin Nagarajah ( Good explanation, good arguments, well structured )
• Zahra Salahuddin ( too brief, looks like an answer to an exercise rather than a case study ; not a Bachelor level :( )
• Anwunobi Alphonsus Okey , Ali Nasser Al Far'ei, Ojo Osaigbovo Eseosa ( Good report at a Bachelors Level. Well Done )
• Ojomah Ernest Mark , Okungbowa Osazee ,Justin Ngoyi ( Good reporting appropriate to present a Case. Definitely suitable at a Bachelors Level. Well Done )
• Ahem aziz salim, Najim albattashi ( Fulfilled requirements )
• Rawaa T Sulima , Fathimath Ali Rasheed, Peter Aboyim Tochukwu ( Well written )
• Anwunobi Alphonsus Okey, Ojo Osaigbovo Esosa, Ali Nasser Ali Al Far'ei (Accepted )
• Aishath Shifa, Fazly Fauzee, Aminath Sa'aadha ( Too brief not up to Bachelor's Level )
• Faridahtul Aqmal Sodi, Mashitah Mahmud (clear explanation )
• Kotaro Yamazaki ( good elaboration and good design for matrix in Question 6 . Keep up the good work )
• Najim Khalifa Al Battashi, Ahmed Aziz Salim ( Well answered especially for Question 6 . Well done )
• Azreen Nadiya, Nur Zetty & Shankari a/p Sivabalan ( Accepted )
• Lim Woei Jiann, Chen Tian Zhi ( Accepted )
• Zhou Min ( Accepted but quite weak. Should elaborate )
• Kiki Wijaya, Yassin Awyusuf, NIcholas ( Accepted )

• Ishola kazeem Adio ,Akintunde Ewebiola Abiodun , Toba- Temitope Juwonlo ( Accepted )

• Shahrul Izham Mohammad Shabar , Norazlin, Mohd. Shah Indera ( Some answers are very well constructed but some are quite surface. Improve further )
• Mohd Harmizan Fazly,Haswan bin Fazaldin , Nor Hidayah binti Abd Halim( Good contents)
• Rotimi Funke Favour,Liu Wei ( Well researched, be careful at the citation but the answers are favourable too )
• Fatma Babu ( accepted but some answers are still weak and surfaced only. )
  
• Mohd Anuar Musa, Melvin Singh Nashatar Singh, Taimoor Irfan ( Overall acceptable but some answers are too brief with not much deliberation - weak for Bachelor's Level )
• Nur Amalia Izzati bt. Abd Rasib ,Nor Shafiqa Binti Lob Shafian ( well constructed and could improve on elaboration and clarity techniques )
• Pan Meng Lu, Zhao Fei Hong ( Acceptable but could be further improved in elaboration )
• DongXiaoping , Pan xiang ( answers too brief with not much elaboration - not a Bachelor standard )
• Bashir T Kirfi, Ahmed AbdulRahman ( Acceptable )
• Wang Zhi, Eng Wyn Yen ( Well written )
• Lim Woei Jiann, Chen Tian Zhi ( Accepted but some are too brief )
•